Monday, October 25, 2021

After success in court Apple appeals judgment in App Store process

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


In September, a court in the dispute between Epic and Apple ruled in favor of the I.T group judged. But now he wants to appeal.

Apple is trying to delay the implementation of a court ruling that would allow more app developers to sell digital items to their users bypassing the company. Apple argues that doing so threatens to harm consumers and the integrity of the App Store platform, according to court documents released over the weekend.

The verdict came at the beginning of September in the process between Apple and Epic Games, the company that produced the popular online game “Fortnite”. Epic has already appealed against it – and now Apple too.

Apple had largely prevailed in the process. But the judge also ruled that Apple should no longer prohibit developers from advising users of ways to buy the items outside the app store at a cheaper price. According to the judgment, this change will take effect on December 9th. Apple demands that it be suspended for the time being.

Apple basically allows the purchase of digital goods – such as virtual items in game apps – via the in-house payment platform. A fee of 15 or 30 percent is due to the group. Apple argues, among other things, that the process would protect users from attempted fraud and misuse of their data. Some app developers criticize that the levy is unjustifiably high.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers came to the conclusion that Apple was entitled to charge a commission in its app store. And she also rejected Epic’s request to open the platform to other app stores. But she saw an infringement of competition in the fact that Apple forbade developers to refer users to cheaper purchase opportunities elsewhere. Therefore, Apple should not prevent the app makers from placing appropriate links and buttons.

A dispute is now looming over how this decision can be interpreted. Apple warns that some developers, from the Group’s point of view, interpreted the judge’s decision too generously and wanted to pack entire alternative payment processes behind the links. As the company argues, this could allow malicious developers to misuse user data, while Apple could not prevent this.

- Advertisement -
Latest news
- Advertisement -
Related news
- Advertisement -

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here