Government Exhibit 52 is designed to identify what and who Maxwell knew, and the defense went to great lengths to hide it from the jury
The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, which begins November 29th, is expected to be the key to discovering details about the sex scandals surrounding the late Jeffery Epstein, who mysteriously died in prison. In that regard, Epstein’s alleged friend’s little black book labeled ‘Government Copy 52’ could provide “convincing evidence of her guilt”.
Maxwell, 65, a longtime Epstein employee who is alleged to have played a prominent role in his sex ring, was arrested on July 2, 2020 and is facing six-week trial in New York federal court for alleged abuse, procuring boys Women and human trafficking crimes that went back decades. If convicted on all counts, she faces more than 80 years in prison. According to the Sunday Times, their lawyers are struggling to prevent the jury from seeing the contents of their contact book, which is a 97-page directory supposedly similar to Epstein’s “Black Book” and allegedly contains contact details of some of the most influential and influential celebrities in the world, including billionaire Richard Branson, former F1 boss Flavio Briatore, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and rocker Mick Jagger.
Government Exhibition 52
Ghislaine Maxwell: Who is the lead accuser in the Epstein employee trial?
According to court records in Maxwell’s trial, the contact book is officially known as “Government Copy 52”. The book remains under a court seal for the time being, and information in it is intended to establish what and who Maxwell knew, including “the conclusion that the defendant knew that at least some of these people were minors”. It includes “contact information of victims who interacted with the defendant during the relevant period” and “is compelling evidence of their guilt”.
The “black book” was acquired by the FBI in 2009 when Epstein’s former butler Alfredo Rodriguez attempted to sell the book for $ 50,000 to an attorney representing one of Maxwell and Epstein’s alleged victims after removing it from Epstein’s Palm mansion Beach named “Pleasure Palace”, where he worked from 2004 to early 2005. Rodriguez later pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice and was sentenced to 18 months in prison in 2010 for trying to sell the book. He died after His criminal case ended and the book has been in the custody of the FBI since then.
A digital copy was released through a lawsuit held by Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused Epstein and Maxwell of wrongdoing. If the book is entered as evidence in the trial, parts of the book can be presented to the jury for deliberation. Maxwell’s attorneys attempted to exclude the book as “unauthenticated hearsay” in a motion filed on Nov. 12, a partially edited court record.
Defense attorneys have also alleged that the copy of the book that prosecutors are trying to use as evidence may have been tampered with. Although the photocopy filed by prosecutors was sealed, the defense alleged that it contained “inexplicable faded markings” and “photocopies of tabs” that “suggested adding, removing or changing pages”. “There is no evidence that these documents were created or maintained by anyone,” wrote her lawyers. “It is very likely that whatever the documents are, they were tampered with or manufactured by Mr. Rodriguez to earn a payday of $ 50,000.”
However, prosecutors have stated that they want to show excerpts from the actual book itself and not just the photocopy. To prove the book’s authenticity, prosecutors also said they wanted to bring in “a witness with personal knowledge of the physical book” who worked for Epstein. The witness will also talk about how Maxwell and Epstein kept “multiple copies” of two contact books.
“Agent-1 has examined government Document 52 in preparation for the trial and recognizes it as the defendant’s contact book, copies of which have been kept in Epstein’s Palm Beach residence, among other places,” the prosecutors wrote. “Agent-1 recognizes the shape, color, and binding of the book, and recognizes the formatting and style of the entries as consistent with the way in which the defendant’s book was organized and how the entries appeared.”